<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Vaccination News</title>
        <link>http://vaccine.immunodefence.com/</link>
        <description></description>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:55:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
        
        <item>
            <title>Poland stands alone in refusing swine flu vaccines</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>
WARSAW, Poland -- The decision seemed fraught with risk: a government
refusing to import swine flu vaccines amid worldwide warnings of a
spreading epidemic.
</p>

<p>But Poland did just that, becoming the only country worldwide known
to reject the vaccines over safety fears and distrust in the drug
companies producing them - concerns international health experts reject
as unfounded. <br /></p>]]></description>
            <link>http://vaccine.immunodefence.com/2010/01/poland-stands-alone-in-refusin.html</link>
            <guid>http://vaccine.immunodefence.com/2010/01/poland-stands-alone-in-refusin.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Flu (Bird, Swine, etc)</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">flu vaccine</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">swine flu</category>
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Legal immunity set for swine flu vaccine makers</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><i><small>By MIKE STOBBE (AP) - Jul 17, 2009</small></i></p>
<p>ATLANTA -- The last time the government embarked on a major vaccine
campaign against a new swine flu, thousands filed claims contending
they suffered side effects from the shots. This time, the government
has already taken steps to head that off.</p><p>Vaccine makers and
federal officials will be immune from lawsuits that result from any new
swine flu vaccine, under a document signed by Secretary of Health and
Human Services Kathleen Sebelius, government health officials said
Friday.</p><p>Since the 1980s, the government has protected vaccine
makers against lawsuits over the use of childhood vaccines. Instead, a
federal court handles claims and decides who will be paid from a
special fund.</p> ]]></description>
            <link>http://vaccine.immunodefence.com/2009/08/legal-immunity-set-for-swine-f.html</link>
            <guid>http://vaccine.immunodefence.com/2009/08/legal-immunity-set-for-swine-f.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Flu (Bird, Swine, etc)</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">General Vaccination News</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Safety and Effectiveness</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">flu vaccine</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">H1N1</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">manipulation</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">swine flu</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Vaccine Development</category>
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 09:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Retired Vax Scientist Would  Never Vaccinate His Kids</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<b><i>"If I had a child now, the last thing I would allow is vaccination."</i><br />-Retired Vaccine Researcher to Jon Rappoport</b><br />&nbsp;<br />Editor's Note -- This interview was posted by Jon Rappoport in early January 2002. You will discover by reading it that the very issues we now face of FORCED vaccination of a laboratory-created vaccine to "protect" us against a laboratory-created "disease" (Swine Flu, Bird flu, etc.) was set into motion a long time ago.<br /><br />The vaccine researcher quoted here flat out says that the World Homicide Organization, WHO, is driven by a DEPOPULATION agenda, and that many African leaders know full well that the explosive spread of HIV and AIDS in Africa was caused by WHO-sponsored vaccinations of the 1970s.<br /> ]]></description>
            <link>http://vaccine.immunodefence.com/2009/08/retired-vax-scientist-would-ne.html</link>
            <guid>http://vaccine.immunodefence.com/2009/08/retired-vax-scientist-would-ne.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">General Vaccination News</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Safety and Effectiveness</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">vaccination for children</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Vaccine Development</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Vaccine Safety</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Vaccine Trials</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 21:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>H1N1 Vaccination: A Eugenics Weapon for &quot;Massive &amp; Targeted Reduction of the World Population.&quot;</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;" align="justify"><a href="http://vaccine.immunodefence.com/2009/07/h1n1-vaccination-a-eugenics-we.html"><img src="http://globalresearch.ca/coverStoryPictures/14312.jpg" align="left" hspace="2" width="100" border=0 /></a>Canadian doctor <a href="http://vaccine.immunodefence.com/2009/07/h1n1-vaccination-a-eugenics-we.html" target="_blank">Ghislaine Lanctôt</a>, author of the Medical Mafia, has underscored the lawsuit recently filed by Austrian journalist <a href="http://www.infowars.com/journalist-fired-over-flu-pandemic-lawsuit/" target="_blank">Jane Bürgermeister</a>
against the WHO, the UN, and several high ranking government and
corporate officials. Bürgermeister has documented how an international
corporate criminal syndicate plans to unleash a deadly flu virus and
institute a forced vaccination program.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;" align="justify">"I
am emerging from a long silence on the subject of vaccination, because
I feel that, this time, the stakes involved are huge. The consequences
may spread much further than anticipated," writes Lanctôt, who believes
the A(H1N1) virus will be used in a pandemic concocted and orchestrated
by the WHO, an international organization that serves military,
political and industrial interests.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://vaccine.immunodefence.com/2009/07/h1n1-vaccination-a-eugenics-we.html</link>
            <guid>http://vaccine.immunodefence.com/2009/07/h1n1-vaccination-a-eugenics-we.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Flu (Bird, Swine, etc)</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">flu vaccine</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">H1N1</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">swine flu</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Vaccine Development</category>
            
            <pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 09:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Children Who Get Flu Vaccine Have Three Times Risk Of Hospitalization For Flu, Study Suggests</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p id="first"><i><span class="date">ScienceDaily (May 20, 2009)</span></i> --
The inactivated flu vaccine does not appear to be effective in
preventing influenza-related hospitalizations in children, especially
the ones with asthma. In fact, children who get the flu vaccine are
more at risk for hospitalization than their peers who do not get the
vaccine, according to new research that will be presented on May 19, at
the 105th International Conference of the American Thoracic Society in
San Diego.</p>

				
				

				
<p>Flu vaccine (trivalent inactivated flu vaccine--TIV) has unknown effects on asthmatics.</p>

<p>"The concerns that vaccination maybe associated with asthma
exacerbations have been disproved with multiple studies in the past,
but the vaccine's effectiveness has not been well-established," said
Avni Joshi, M.D., of the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN. "This study was
aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of the TIV in children overall,
as well as the children with asthma, to prevent influenza-related
hospitalization."</p>
 ]]></description>
            <link>http://vaccine.immunodefence.com/2009/05/children-who-get-flu-vaccine-h.html</link>
            <guid>http://vaccine.immunodefence.com/2009/05/children-who-get-flu-vaccine-h.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Flu (Bird, Swine, etc)</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Influenza</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Safety and Effectiveness</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">flu</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">flu vaccine</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">risk</category>
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 11:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>The Gardasil Scam: HPV Does NOT Cause Cancer</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Some time ago at Matewan I expressed doubts about Gardasil,
the&nbsp;vaccination that was being forced on teenage girls supposedly
because it acted to prevent cervical cancer. I suggested then that
there was something fishy about all the political wheeling and dealing
behind the scenes that had resulted in various governors - Texas' Rick
Perry for one - making Gardasil vaccinations mandatory.</p>
<p>It all sounded cooked. To begin with, Perry had very heavy
connections with the pharmaceutical industry, including the companies
that manufacture and distribute Gardasil. Secondly, studies show that
some 94% of sexually active&nbsp;women have some form of HPV and in almost
all those cases, <strong>it goes away by itself</strong>. Why, I
wondered, would we be making the injections mandatory for a disease
that cures itself without troubling the patient for the sake of <em>maybe</em> protecting the small slice of the population that <em>might</em> develop cervical cancer from HPV?</p>
<p>It sounded like another Bog Pharma scam but it may be far worse. Turns out that studies actually show that not only does HPV <strong>NOT</strong> cause cervical cancer, the Gardasil itself <strong>does</strong>.</p>
<blockquote><p><span style="font-size: 9pt; color: rgb(50, 50, 50); font-family: Verdana;">This
revelation should be quite shocking to anyone who has been following
the debate over Gardasil and mandatory vaccinations of teenage girls.
First, it reveals that <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Gardasil appears to <em><i><font face="Verdana"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">increase</span></font></i></em> disease by 44.6 percent in certain people</span></b> -- namely, those who were already carriers of the same HPV strains used in the vaccine.</span></p>
<p>In other words, it appears that <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">if
the vaccine is given to a young woman who already carries HPV in a
"harmless" state, it may "activate" the infection and directly cause
precancerous lesions to appear</span></b>. The vaccine, in other words, may accelerate the development of precancerous lesions in women.</p></blockquote>
]]></description>
            <link>http://vaccine.immunodefence.com/2009/03/the-gardasil-scam-hpv-does-not.html</link>
            <guid>http://vaccine.immunodefence.com/2009/03/the-gardasil-scam-hpv-does-not.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Cancer Vaccine</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">cervical cancer</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">gardasil</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">HPV</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">manipulation</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">vaccine</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Vaccine Effectiveness</category>
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 21:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Deaths Associated with HPV Vaccine Start Rolling In, Over 3500 Adverse Affects Reported</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://immunodefence.com/ii/01f1.gif" border="0" hspace="2" vspace="2" width="100" height="100" align="left" />TORONTO, September 20, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) - As Canada, in large part due to aggressive behind the scenes lobbying, rolls out the not-comprehensively-tested Merck HPV vaccine for girls as young as nine, a look at developments on the vaccine south of the border should cause Canadians serious concern.&nbsp; In the United States a similar lobby campaign by the same company launched the mass HPV vaccination of girls beginning in June last year. &nbsp;<br /><br />In just little over a year, the HPV vaccine has been associated with at least five deaths, not to mention thousands of reports of adverse effects, hundreds deemed serious, and many that required hospitalization.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://vaccine.immunodefence.com/2008/02/deaths-associated-with-hpv-vac.html</link>
            <guid>http://vaccine.immunodefence.com/2008/02/deaths-associated-with-hpv-vac.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Cancer Vaccine</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">HPV</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">HPV cancer</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">vaccination for children</category>
            
            <pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 16:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Novartis inks $500M anti-smoking vaccine pact</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://vaccine.immunodefence.com/i/smoking.gif" border="1" hspace="2" vspace="2" align="left" />Novartis has demonstrated its commitment to the vaccine market with a $500 million (600 million Swiss francs) global licensing deal for Switzerland&#39;s Cytos Biotechnology&#39;s anti-smoking vaccine. Cytos gains 35 million Swiss francs up front for CYT002-NicQb, which is scheduled to go into late-stage trials in 2008. The rest of the money will be paid in scheduled milestones for a successful development program. Novartis takes over all development costs and responsibilities. NicQb works by spurring the development of antibodies that attach to nicotine molecules, making them too big to penetrate the blood-brain barrier, thereby reducing nicotine stimulation.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://vaccine.immunodefence.com/2007/04/novartis-inks-500m-antismoking.html</link>
            <guid>http://vaccine.immunodefence.com/2007/04/novartis-inks-500m-antismoking.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">General Vaccination News</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">anti-smoking vaccine</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">smoking</category>
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Senate votes to overturn Perry&apos;s vaccination order</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://immunodefence.com/ii/senate.jpg" border="0" alt="senate" title="senate" hspace="4" vspace="2" width="107" height="100" align="left" />AUSTIN &mdash; The Senate Monday passed a bill overturning Gov. Rick Perry&#39;s order that middle-school girls be vaccinated against a sexually transmitted virus linked to cervical cancer, with a requirement that the issue be reviewed in four years.</p> <p>After a brief debate, the Senate voted 30-1, with Sen. Leticia Van de Putte, D-San Antonio, casting the lone &quot;no&quot; vote.</p> <p>The bill would prevent the HPV vaccine from being required for school enrollment until 2011. The version passed by the House has no expiration date.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://vaccine.immunodefence.com/2007/04/senate-votes-to-overturn-perry.html</link>
            <guid>http://vaccine.immunodefence.com/2007/04/senate-votes-to-overturn-perry.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Cancer Vaccine</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">cervical cancer</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">HPV cancer</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">politics</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">vaccine</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Taking A Jab At Cancer By Stimulating The Immune System</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://immunodefence.com/ii/clinical_trials1.jpg" border="0" alt="clinical trials" title="clinical trials" hspace="4" vspace="2" width="100" height="150" align="right" />As the first FDA-approved cancer vaccine, designed to protect against human papillomavirus, has moved from scientific discussion to social debate, other vaccine studies are continuing to make progress. While HPV vaccine efforts had the &quot;benefit&quot; of a viral source for the disease, other researchers are developing vaccines for cancers that are not virally based, in an effort to coax the immune system into attacking cancerous cells. </p><p>At the 2007 Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research, presentations on ongoing HPV trials and other new approaches to stimulating the immune system are injecting momentum into cancer vaccine research. </p>]]></description>
            <link>http://vaccine.immunodefence.com/2007/04/taking-a-jab-at-cancer-by-stim.html</link>
            <guid>http://vaccine.immunodefence.com/2007/04/taking-a-jab-at-cancer-by-stim.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Cancer Vaccine</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">cancer vaccine</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">clinical trials</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Italy to Offer Cervical Cancer Vaccine</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://immunodefence.com/ii/01f1.gif" border="0" hspace="2" vspace="2" width="100" height="100" align="left" />A vaccine against the sexually transmitted virus that can cause cervical cancer went on sale Wednesday in Italy, the first European Union nation to offer the vaccine free for 12-year-old girls, the Italian Health Ministry said.<br /><br />The ministry said a campaign will be launched soon to encourage the free vaccination of 12-year-olds but that the vaccine for the human papillomavirus, of HPV, will not be mandatory. Older girls and women who want the vaccination will have to pay for it.</p><p>Proponents of the vaccine say it will be most effective when given before girls become sexually active. Ministry officials said the vaccine is being supplied by Sanofi-Pasteur, the vaccine division of Sanofi-Aventis. </p>]]></description>
            <link>http://vaccine.immunodefence.com/2007/03/italy-to-offer-cervical-cancer.html</link>
            <guid>http://vaccine.immunodefence.com/2007/03/italy-to-offer-cervical-cancer.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Cancer Vaccine</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">cancer</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">HPV</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">human papillomavirus</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">vaccine</category>
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 00:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Merck’s Miracle Vaccine –What Is This Story Really About?</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<em><img src="http://immunodefence.com/ii/merck_logo.jpg" border="0" alt="merck" title="merck" hspace="4" vspace="2" width="100" height="100" align="right" />By Maggie Mahar</em>, The Health Care Blog<p>February 22, 2007 - Yesterday, Merck announced that it is no longer going to try to persuade states  to make its new $360 cervical cancer vaccine mandatory for all pre-teens. (At  least, not publicly). The company wouldn&rsquo;t divulge how much it has spent, to  date, on its lobbying campaign.</p> <p>Virtually everyone has heard about &ldquo;Gardasil.&rdquo; Planned Parenthood backs it.  Women in Government extols its virtues. (Both organizations receive significant  contributions from Merck). Not long ago, a glowing New York Times editorial  congratulated Texas governor Rick Perry for mandating &ldquo;<a href="http://select.nytimes.com/search/restricted/article?res=F60615F9385B0C758CDDAB0894DF404482%29">A  Vaccine To&nbsp; Save Women&rsquo;s Lives</a>.&rdquo;( So far as I know, Merck makes no  contributions to The New York Times, but Perry&rsquo;s former chief of staff is a  Merck lobbyist.) At this point, twenty states have drafted plans to follow  Perry&rsquo;s example.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://vaccine.immunodefence.com/2007/03/mercks-miracle-vaccine-what-is.html</link>
            <guid>http://vaccine.immunodefence.com/2007/03/mercks-miracle-vaccine-what-is.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Cancer Vaccine</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">cancer vaccine</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">gardasil</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">merck</category>
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 12:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Deaf girl sues over MMR vaccine</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p align="left"><img src="http://immunodefence.com/ii/mmr_vaccine.jpg" border="0" alt="MMR vaccine" title="MMR vaccine" hspace="4" vspace="2" width="100" height="100" align="left" />A TEENAGER is fighting to prove that the MMR vaccine made her  deaf.</p>  <p align="left">Katie Stephen, 16, fell ill with a fever 10 days after being  injected with an early form of the immunisation as a toddler in 1991.</p>  <p align="left">Parents Wendy and Alistair believe the vaccine, which included a  strain of mumps, was responsible for their daughter losing the hearing in her  left ear.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://vaccine.immunodefence.com/2007/03/deaf-girl-sues-over-mmr-vaccin.html</link>
            <guid>http://vaccine.immunodefence.com/2007/03/deaf-girl-sues-over-mmr-vaccin.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Safety and Effectiveness</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">MMR vaccination</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">risk</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">side-effects</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">vaccination for children</category>
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 12:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Nasal flu vaccine works better for kids</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<img src="http://www.immunodefence.com/ii/girl_flu.jpg" border="1" hspace="2" vspace="2" width="114" height="110" align="right" /><p>Children given a flu vaccine by nasal spray were better protected against the disease than those given the old shot in the arm, according to new research in the most recent New England Journal of Medicine.</p> <p>The study, which followed nearly 8,500 children in 16 countries, found the vaccine sniffed up the nose reduced the influenza &quot;attack rate&quot; in children by 55 percent compared to the traditional injections.</p><p>The attack rate is the number of people who get sick compared to the total number of people in a study group.</p><p>&quot;Children get the flu twice as often as adults,&quot; said Dr. Robert Belshe of St. Louis University, the study&#39;s lead author. &quot;It&#39;s important to vaccinate kids against influenza -- and to identify new and more effective flu vaccine options -- because kids have a higher attack rate for influenza infection than adults.&quot; </p>]]></description>
            <link>http://vaccine.immunodefence.com/2007/03/nasal-flu-vaccine-works-better.html</link>
            <guid>http://vaccine.immunodefence.com/2007/03/nasal-flu-vaccine-works-better.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Influenza</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">flu</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">influenza</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">nasal spray</category>
            
            <pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 00:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>New Powdered Tuberculosis Vaccine May Lead to Life-Saving Aerosol</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.immunodefence.com/ii/tuberculosis.jpg" border="0" alt="Powdered Tuberculosis Vaccine" title="Powdered Tuberculosis Vaccine" hspace="2" vspace="2" width="143" height="100" align="left" /><strong>Early tests set the stage for health workers to administer the vaccine as an aerosol instead of an injection.</strong></p><p> 	 		<em>A new powdered form of BCG, the tuberculosis vaccine, mixes a mycobacterium [green] with leucine [</em><em>gray] and may pave the way for more powerful, needle-free forms of the vaccine. <br /></em></p><p>A new powdered form of tuberculosis (TB) vaccine may help save some of the nearly two million lives lost to the disease annually. In preliminary tests, the powdered form contained more active bacterial cells than a freeze-dried version similar to the existing vaccine. The result may pave the way for health workers to administer the vaccine as an aerosol to the lungs instead of as an injection, possibly leading to a more effective treatment. </p>]]></description>
            <link>http://vaccine.immunodefence.com/2007/03/new-powdered-tuberculosis-vacc.html</link>
            <guid>http://vaccine.immunodefence.com/2007/03/new-powdered-tuberculosis-vacc.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Tuberculosis Vaccine</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">BCG</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">tuberculosis</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">vaccine trials</category>
            
            <pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 00:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>

